Buffer
Buffer is a social scheduling tool built around one clean idea: queue and schedule posts across Instagram, X, Facebook, LinkedIn, TikTok, YouTube and Threads from a single feed. It bills per channel, not per seat, and its free tier is a real standing plan (3 channels, 1 user) rather than a trial.
Verified against: buffer.combuffer.com as of 2026-09-18
Quick verdict: Buffer earns 4.0/5 in our research-based assessment as the cleanest cross-network scheduler in the set, with a standing free tier and per-channel (not per-seat) billing. It fits solo operators and small teams who want a cheap, simple queue across Instagram, X, Facebook, LinkedIn, TikTok, YouTube and Threads, with the caveat that collaboration and analytics are lighter than Hootsuite or Metricool. (Research sweep, no paid workspace tested.)
- Our rating: 4.0/5
- Strongest dimension: Functionality (4/5, research only)
- Weakest dimension: Collaboration (3/5, research only)
- Pricing: Free plan · $5/channel/mo (annual)
- Verification: Research-only pass over official sources, last checked 2026-09-18. Sources: buffer.com, buffer.com
Buffer pricing details
- Free plan available
- 14-day paid trial
- paid plans from $5/channel/mo (annual)
- essentials $6/channel/mo · Team $12/channel/mo (monthly)
- essentials $5/channel/mo · Team $10-12/channel/mo (annual)
Buffer bills by channel, not by user. Free $0 forever: 3 channels, 10 scheduled posts per channel, 1 user. Essentials $6/channel/mo monthly ($5 annual, 14-day trial). Team $12/channel/mo monthly ($10 annual) adds analytics and integrations. Each additional channel adds to the bill; there is no per-user charge, so it scales better for many-brand accounts than seat-based rivals.
In our index: Free plan available; paid from $5/channel/mo ($6 monthly, Essentials), Team $10-12/channel/mo; per-channel, not per-seat
How Buffer scores across our 6 index dimensions
- Functionality: 4/5 (research only)
- Usability: 4/5 (research only)
- Stability: 4/5 (research only)
- Collaboration: 3/5 (research only)
- Localization: 3/5 (research only)
- Value: 4/5 (research only)
Score rationale: Per-channel, not per-seat, pricing is the differentiator: 3-channel free tier is a real standing plan, and Essentials at $5/channel/mo annual is the cheapest paid entry in this cluster. UI is clean and fast (ease 4/5). Collaboration (approvers, shared feeds) is thinner than Hootsuite's team workflows (3/5). English-only UI (3/5). No hands-on testing this round; figures from the official pricing page.
What Buffer does well
- Free plan is a standing plan (3 channels, 1 user), not a trial
- Per-channel, not per-seat, pricing — the cheapest paid entry in the cluster ($5/channel/mo annual)
- Covers Instagram, X, Facebook, LinkedIn, TikTok, YouTube and Threads from one feed
- Clean, fast UI (ease 4/5) with 14-day paid trial
Where Buffer falls short
- Collaboration (approvers, shared feeds) is lighter than Hootsuite's team workflows
- No built-in deep analytics suite the way Metricool ships — scheduling is the strength, not measurement
- No X-removal surprises, but feature depth trails an enterprise platform
How Buffer compares to other Social Media Scheduling tools
Our index tracks 5 Social Media Scheduling tools. Buffer sits at 4.0/5, with essentials $5/channel/mo · team $10-12/channel/mo (annual). Here are the 4 closest alternatives we hold pricing and scoring evidence for.
- Metricool — 4.2/5 · Free plan · $20/mo (annual)
Metricool is an all-in-one social planner plus analytics platform: schedule across networks, run a content calendar and get built-in analytics and competitor tracking. It bills by brand and has a genuinely useful free tier. - Hootsuite — 4.1/5 · 14-day free trial (no credit card) · $99/user/mo (annual, Standard)
Hootsuite is the established enterprise social management platform: publish, monitor and route a shared inbox across networks, with Wisdom AI and Talkwalker listening. It bills per user and has no free plan. - Publer — 4.0/5 · Free plan · $5/account/mo (annual)
Publer is a low-cost social planner that bills per account on a flat workspace with unlimited scheduling. Its free tier covers 3 social accounts, and its paid entry is among the cheapest in the cluster when a small team needs many accounts without the per-seat math. - Later — 3.8/5 · 14-day trial (credit card required, auto-charge at expiry) · $18.75/mo (annual)
Later is a social-first scheduler built around a visual Instagram-first grid. It has no free plan — only a 14-day trial that requires a credit card and auto-charges — and bills by 'Social Set' (a bundle of profiles and posts) rather than per user.
Frequently asked questions about Buffer
How much does Buffer cost?
Free plan available; 14-day paid trial; paid plans from $5/channel/mo (annual); essentials $6/channel/mo · Team $12/channel/mo (monthly); essentials $5/channel/mo · Team $10-12/channel/mo (annual). Billing detail: Buffer bills by channel, not by user. Free $0 forever: 3 channels, 10 scheduled posts per channel, 1 user. Essentials $6/channel/mo monthly ($5 annual, 14-day trial). Team $12/channel/mo monthly ($10 annual) adds analytics and integrations. Each additional channel adds to the bill; there is no per-user charge, so it scales better for many-brand accounts than seat-based rivals. Figures verified 2026-09-18.
Does Buffer have a free plan?
Yes. Buffer has a free tier; paid plans start at $5/channel/mo (annual).
What is Buffer rated in our index?
Buffer sits at 4.0/5 in our index, strongest on functionality (4/5, research only) and weakest on collaboration (3/5, research only). Buffer earns 4.0/5 in our research-based assessment as the cleanest cross-network scheduler in the set, with a standing free tier and per-channel (not per-seat) billing. It fits solo operators and small teams who want a cheap, simple queue across Instagram, X, Facebook, LinkedIn, TikTok, YouTube and Threads, with the caveat that collaboration and analytics are lighter than Hootsuite or Metricool. (Research sweep, no paid workspace tested.)
What are the drawbacks of Buffer?
Collaboration (approvers, shared feeds) is lighter than Hootsuite's team workflows No built-in deep analytics suite the way Metricool ships — scheduling is the strength, not measurement No X-removal surprises, but feature depth trails an enterprise platform.
What does Buffer do well?
Free plan is a standing plan (3 channels, 1 user), not a trial Per-channel, not per-seat, pricing — the cheapest paid entry in the cluster ($5/channel/mo annual) Covers Instagram, X, Facebook, LinkedIn, TikTok, YouTube and Threads from one feed Clean, fast UI (ease 4/5) with 14-day paid trial.
How was Buffer verified?
Research-only pass over official sources, last checked 2026-09-18. Sources: buffer.com, buffer.com.
What are the alternatives to Buffer?
We track Publer, Later, Hootsuite, Metricool as the closest alternatives in our Social Media Scheduling index, and 4 head-to-head comparisons against Buffer are available.