← All Conversational AI tools

Botpress vs Chatbase 2026 — Scores & Verdict

Quick verdict: Botpress is our overall pick for Botpress vs Chatbase.

Botpress and Chatbase both build conversational-AI agents, but they sit on opposite ends of the class: Botpress is weighted to developer-built agent flexibility, while Chatbase focuses on fast no-code knowledge-base bots. Pick Botpress for the stronger play on that dimension.

~700 words · 2 tools compared

Tool Rating Pricing Best for
Botpress Best overall Best for teams 4.2/5 Free $150/mo (Plus) Botpress is the open-source, developer-oriented AI-agent and AI-native helpdesk platform —…
Chatbase Best free 4.1/5 Free $15/mo (Hobby, annual) Chatbase is the no-code AI chatbot trained on your own data — deploy a knowledge-base agen…
Bottom line: Botpress and Chatbase are genuinely different animals, and the choice is almost a pricing-model choice. Botpress targets developer-built agent flexibility, whereas Chatbase targets a fast no-code knowledge-base chatbot. Default: if self-serve and predictable pricing matter, take Botpress; if build depth or channel breadth matters, take Botpress.

Pricing and details

Botpress · 4.2/5

Free plan available · $150/mo (Plus)

Conversation-priced, not seat-priced (LLM costs pass through at vendor rates). May 2026 update: unlimited bots on paid plans, raised storage, 'Always Alive' on all paid tiers. Free = 100 conversations/mo. Note: third-party sources still list the older Creator $89/Pro $495 tiers — the official May 2026 blog is authoritative.

Enterprise is annual/custom; paid plans add unlimited bots and increased storage (May 2026 restructure)

AI Customer Support · Open Source · Developer · AI Helpdesk

Botpress is the open-source, developer-oriented AI-agent and AI-native helpdesk platform — visual flow builder plus GPT-native nodes; free 100 conversations/mo, Plus from $150/mo (May 2026 pricing).

Score breakdown

Evidence legend: ★ Hands-on tested = we used the product ourselves; Verified (docs) = checked against the vendor’s own pages and pricing.

FunctionalityVerified (docs)
5.0
UsabilityVerified (docs)
3.0
StabilityVerified (docs)
5.0
CollaborationVerified (docs)
4.0
LocalizationVerified (docs)
3.0
ValueVerified (docs)
4.0

📎 The developer/agency pick: open-source, self-hostable platform with a visual flow builder plus GPT-native nodes, now positioning an AI-native helpdesk that resolves L1-L3 tickets with hot handoff. Priced on conversations (not seats) with LLM pass-through; free 100 conversations/mo, Plus $150/mo after the May 2026 restructure. Best where you have engineers; weaker as a turnkey no-code tool. Research sweep; official blog pricing supersedes older third-party figures.

Pros

  • Open-source core with a visual flow builder plus GPT-native nodes for custom logic
  • Conversation-priced, not seat-priced, which suits developer teams
  • A free tier of 100 conversations/mo to start

Cons

  • Developer-oriented: expect configuration and code, not a drag-and-drop marketer UI
  • Paid plans jumped in the May 2026 restructure (Plus $150/mo, Team $750/mo)
  • LLM usage passes through at vendor rates, so model costs are on top of the subscription

Pricing verified 2026-09-21

Chatbase · 4.1/5

Free plan available · $15/mo (Hobby, annual)

Credit-based: different models consume credits at different rates (premium models burn faster), so actual responses-per-credit varies. Free = 50 msg/mo, 1 member; paid tiers add message volume, API access, integrations and team seats. 20% off yearly. Branding removal and custom domain are paid add-ons.

Hobby $15/mo · Standard $99/mo · Pro ~$400/mo (annual; 2 months free)

AI Customer Support · No-code · Multi-model · RAG

Chatbase is the no-code AI chatbot trained on your own data — deploy a knowledge-base agent to your site, WhatsApp or voice; credit-based plans from a free 50-message tier up to $40/mo Hobby.

Score breakdown

Evidence legend: ★ Hands-on tested = we used the product ourselves; Verified (docs) = checked against the vendor’s own pages and pricing.

FunctionalityVerified (docs)
4.0
UsabilityVerified (docs)
5.0
StabilityVerified (docs)
4.0
CollaborationVerified (docs)
3.0
LocalizationVerified (docs)
3.0
ValueVerified (docs)
4.0

📎 The accessible no-code option: train a chatbot on your own docs/PDFs/website with model-agnostic RAG, deploy to web/WhatsApp/email/voice, with human handoff and a built-in helpdesk. Credit-based pricing (premium models cost more per message) from a free 50-message tier to $40/mo Hobby. The cheapest way in with real multi-model choice. Research sweep; the credit-vs-message math needs watching at volume.

Pros

  • No-code: upload your data and deploy a knowledge-base agent in minutes
  • Credit-based plans start free (50 msg/mo) and a $40/mo Hobby tier
  • Deploy to website, WhatsApp and voice from one agent

Cons

  • Credit-based: premium models burn credits faster, so responses-per-credit varies
  • The free 50-message tier is a demo scale, not a production floor
  • Branding and model-limits on lower tiers push real usage to paid

Pricing verified 2026-09-21

Frequently asked questions

Which is better overall, Botpress or Chatbase?

Botpress is our overall pick (4.2/5 vs 4.1/5). Botpress and Chatbase both build conversational-AI agents, but they sit on opposite ends of the class: Botpress is weighted to developer-built agent flexibility, while Chatbase focuses on fast no-code knowledge-base bots. Pick Botpress for the stronger play on that dimension.

Do Botpress and Chatbase offer free plans?

Botpress and Chatbase have a free tier. Botpress paid plans start at $150/mo (Plus); Chatbase paid plans start at $15/mo (Hobby, annual).

What does Botpress cost?

$150/mo (Plus) — Conversation-priced, not seat-priced (LLM costs pass through at vendor rates). May 2026 update: unlimited bots on paid plans, raised storage, 'Always Alive' on all paid tiers. Free = 100 conversations/mo. Note: third-party sources still list the older Creator $89/Pro $495 tiers — the official May 2026 blog is authoritative. Prices were last verified on 2026-09-21.

More Conversational AI comparisons