← All tools
4.0/5
Free trial available · $52/mo annual (Starter) · Subscription per seat, monthly or ~35-40% less annually. Starter caps at 7 files/month (no rollover); Advanced adds unlimited files (soft fair-use), AI summaries and translation. No pay-as-you-go and no free tier — trial only. The priciest entry here.

Trint

Trint is the premium journalism transcription editor — Starter $80/mo (7 files) or Advanced $100/mo unlimited, with Story Builder and 54-language translation.

AI Transcription Services JournalismPer-seatEditorTranslation Docs-based research — manual check pending

Verified against: trint.com as of 2026-09-22

Evidence legend: ★ Hands-on tested = we used the product ourselves; Verified (docs) = checked against the vendor’s own pages and pricing.

FunctionalityVerified (docs)
4.0
UsabilityVerified (docs)
4.0
StabilityVerified (docs)
4.0
CollaborationVerified (docs)
4.0
LocalizationVerified (docs)
5.0
ValueVerified (docs)
3.0

📎 The media-editor pick: built for journalists with a strong transcript editor and Story Builder, but the most expensive and a hard 7-file Starter cap. Annual $52/mo. Research sweep; great tool, weak value for small or bursty use.

Quick verdict: Trint is the premium newsroom tool: an excellent editor for shaping long interviews into stories, but the priciest and capped hard at 7 Starter files. Pick it when editorial workflow quality justifies $80/mo (or $52 annual); for plain transcription on a budget, Rev, Sonix or Descript deliver the transcript for less. The numbers are Starter $80 per seat per month with a hard cap of 7 files and no rollover, or $52 per seat monthly billed annually; Advanced rises to $100 per seat monthly ($60 annual) and removes the cap with unlimited files under a soft fair-use rule, plus AI summaries and translation. That roughly 35 to 40 percent annual discount is the only way the entry price makes sense, because there is no pay-as-you-go and no free tier — a trial is the cheapest way to test it. Translation runs to 54 languages and the Story Builder is genuinely good at turning long interviews into usable stories, which is the real reason to pay the premium: what you are buying is editorial workflow quality, not transcript volume.

  • Our rating: 4.0/5
  • Strongest dimension: Localization (5/5, research only)
  • Weakest dimension: Value (3/5, research only)
  • Pricing: Free trial available · $52/mo annual (Starter)
  • Verification: Research-only pass over official sources, last checked 2026-09-22. Sources: trint.com

Trint pricing details

  • Free trial available
  • paid plans from $52/mo annual (Starter)
  • starter $80/seat/mo (7 files) · Advanced $100/seat/mo (unlimited)
  • starter $52/seat/mo · Advanced $60/seat/mo

Subscription per seat, monthly or ~35-40% less annually. Starter caps at 7 files/month (no rollover); Advanced adds unlimited files (soft fair-use), AI summaries and translation. No pay-as-you-go and no free tier — trial only. The priciest entry here.

In our index: Starter $80/seat/mo (7 files) · Advanced $100/seat/mo (unlimited)

How Trint scores across our 6 index dimensions

  • Functionality: 4/5 (research only)
  • Usability: 4/5 (research only)
  • Stability: 4/5 (research only)
  • Collaboration: 4/5 (research only)
  • Localization: 5/5 (research only)
  • Value: 3/5 (research only)

Score rationale: The media-editor pick: built for journalists with a strong transcript editor and Story Builder, but the most expensive and a hard 7-file Starter cap. Annual $52/mo. Research sweep; great tool, weak value for small or bursty use.

What Trint does well

  • Polished editor and Story Builder built for long-form journalism
  • Unlimited files and translation on Advanced
  • Strong collaboration for newsrooms

Where Trint falls short

  • Most expensive entry here; Starter hard-caps 7 files with no rollover
  • No pay-as-you-go and no free tier (trial only)
  • Per-seat pricing makes freelance teams costly

How Trint compares to other AI Transcription Services tools

Our index tracks 5 AI Transcription Services tools. Trint sits at 4.0/5, with starter $52/seat/mo · advanced $60/seat/mo. Here are the 4 closest alternatives we hold pricing and scoring evidence for.

  • Rev — 4.5/5 · Free plan · $0.25/min AI (or Pro subscription)
    Rev is the pay-per-minute transcription service — AI at $0.25/min and 99% human at $1.99/min, plus a free 45-minute/month tier and Rev Pro subscription.
  • Descript — 4.3/5 · Free plan · $16/mo (Hobbyist, annual)
    Descript is text-based audio/video editing with transcription built in — free plan, Hobbyist $16/mo annual, editing the transcript edits the media.
  • Sonix — 4.2/5 · Free trial (limited) · $10/hr pay-as-you-go
    Sonix is fast multilingual transcription by the hour — $10/hr pay-as-you-go or Core $25/mo annual including 5 hours, with 50+ language translation.
  • Riverside — 4.1/5 · Free plan · $24/mo (Pro, annual)
    Riverside is studio recording with separate-track transcription — free 2 hours to try, Pro $24/mo annual, unlimited separate audio/video transcripts on paid plans.

Frequently asked questions about Trint

How much does Trint cost?

Free trial available; paid plans from $52/mo annual (Starter); starter $80/seat/mo (7 files) · Advanced $100/seat/mo (unlimited); starter $52/seat/mo · Advanced $60/seat/mo. Billing detail: Subscription per seat, monthly or ~35-40% less annually. Starter caps at 7 files/month (no rollover); Advanced adds unlimited files (soft fair-use), AI summaries and translation. No pay-as-you-go and no free tier — trial only. The priciest entry here. Figures verified 2026-09-22.

Does Trint have a free plan?

No free plan is listed for Trint, but a trial is offered (Free trial available). Paid plans start at $52/mo annual (Starter).

What is Trint rated in our index?

Trint sits at 4.0/5 in our index, strongest on localization (5/5, research only) and weakest on value (3/5, research only). Trint is the premium newsroom tool: an excellent editor for shaping long interviews into stories, but the priciest and capped hard at 7 Starter files. Pick it when editorial workflow quality justifies $80/mo (or $52 annual); for plain transcription on a budget, Rev, Sonix or Descript deliver the transcript for less. The numbers are Starter $80 per seat per month with a hard cap of 7 files and no rollover, or $52 per seat monthly billed annually; Advanced rises to $100 per seat monthly ($60 annual) and removes the cap with unlimited files under a soft fair-use rule, plus AI summaries and translation. That roughly 35 to 40 percent annual discount is the only way the entry price makes sense, because there is no pay-as-you-go and no free tier — a trial is the cheapest way to test it. Translation runs to 54 languages and the Story Builder is genuinely good at turning long interviews into usable stories, which is the real reason to pay the premium: what you are buying is editorial workflow quality, not transcript volume.

What are the drawbacks of Trint?

Most expensive entry here; Starter hard-caps 7 files with no rollover No pay-as-you-go and no free tier (trial only) Per-seat pricing makes freelance teams costly.

What does Trint do well?

Polished editor and Story Builder built for long-form journalism Unlimited files and translation on Advanced Strong collaboration for newsrooms.

How was Trint verified?

Research-only pass over official sources, last checked 2026-09-22. Sources: trint.com.

What are the alternatives to Trint?

We track Rev, Descript, Sonix, Riverside as the closest alternatives in our AI Transcription Services index, and 4 head-to-head comparisons against Trint are available.