← All AI Coding Assistants tools

Windsurf vs Kiro 2026 — Price, Meter & Verdict

  • Pricing last checked: 2026-09-30

Windsurf and Kiro differ on quota-based forecasting versus credit-based forecasting; the higher-rated Windsurf is the default unless the other matches your buying model.

~700 words · 2 tools compared

Tool Rating Pricing Best for
Windsurf (Cognition) 4.0/5 Free $20/mo (Pro) Windsurf, now part of Cognition, is the quota-priced editor: free with a light agent quota…
Kiro (AWS) 3.9/5 Free $20/user/mo (Pro) Kiro is AWS's spec-driven IDE: free with 50 credits a month, then Pro at $20, Pro+ at $40,…
Bottom line: The two forecastable meters in the class. Windsurf caps by time — daily and weekly quotas — so a quota is either available or it is not, and Pro is $20; Kiro caps by work — 1,000 credits at $20, where a spec run consumes 15 to 25 credits — so a busy week can force add-on credits at $0.04 each. Both include a free tier, both are $20 at entry, and both have cloud or team structures ($80 + $40 per seat for Windsurf Teams; teams up to 500 users for Kiro). Choose based on whether your pace is steady (quota) or bursty (credits).

Pricing and details

Windsurf (Cognition) · 4.0/5

Free plan available · $20/mo (Pro)

Pricing is quota-based, not credit-based: each tier carries daily and weekly agent quotas and access to model families including SWE-1.5, Claude and GPT. Cloud agents and CLI access extend to Pro through a dated promotion, and Extra Usage is bought at API pricing above the quota.

No separate annual pricing published on the site; quotas reset daily and weekly

Quota-based · SWE-1.5 model · Cloud agents · Unlimited tab completion

Windsurf, now part of Cognition, is the quota-priced editor: free with a light agent quota, Pro at $20, Max at $200, and Teams at $80 plus $40 per full developer seat.

Score breakdown

Evidence legend: ★ Hands-on tested = we used the product ourselves; Verified (docs) = checked against the vendor’s own pages and pricing.

FunctionalityVerified (docs)
4.0
UsabilityVerified (docs)
4.0
StabilityVerified (docs)
4.0
CollaborationVerified (docs)
4.0
LocalizationVerified (docs)
4.0
ValueVerified (docs)
4.0

📎 The team-oriented editor from the Devin company, priced to sit between Copilot and Cursor: Pro at $20 matches Cursor Individual, but Teams start at $80 for the plan plus $40 per full seat, which is the highest entry cost for a paid team here. Unlimited tab completion is on every tier, and the quota model is simpler to forecast than credits.

Pros

  • Quota pricing is the most forecastable in this class — daily and weekly caps instead of a depleting credit balance
  • Free tier includes a light agent quota and unlimited tab completions, unlike Copilot's usage-limited free plan
  • Model coverage is broad: SWE-1.5 alongside Claude and GPT, with cloud agents and CLI access on paid tiers

Cons

  • Teams start at $80 for the plan plus $40 per full seat, the highest entry cost for a paid team here
  • Pro at $20 matches Cursor exactly while carrying a less mature ecosystem and community mindshare
  • Ownership history is noisy — Cognition's acquisition means pricing moves through the Devin blog, not a Windsurf channel

Pricing verified 2026-09-30

Kiro (AWS) · 3.9/5

Free plan available · $20/user/mo (Pro)

Kiro absorbed Amazon Q Developer's IDE role (Q Developer closed to new signups on 2026-05-15, end of support 2027-04-30). Credits are a unit of agent work, not a single interaction: a full spec run consumes 15 to 25 credits, add-on credits cost $0.04 each, and paid tiers can pool overages for teams.

No separate annual plan; plans bill monthly and credits reset on the 1st of each calendar month

Spec-driven · Credits · AWS Bedrock models · Replaces Amazon Q Developer

Kiro is AWS's spec-driven IDE: free with 50 credits a month, then Pro at $20, Pro+ at $40, Pro Max at $100 and Power at $200 per user, with overage at $0.04 per credit.

Score breakdown

Evidence legend: ★ Hands-on tested = we used the product ourselves; Verified (docs) = checked against the vendor’s own pages and pricing.

FunctionalityVerified (docs)
4.0
UsabilityVerified (docs)
3.0
StabilityVerified (docs)
4.0
CollaborationVerified (docs)
4.0
LocalizationVerified (docs)
4.0
ValueVerified (docs)
4.0

📎 The new default for AWS-centric teams: it replaces Amazon Q Developer's IDE role and routes between Claude Sonnet 4.5, Opus and Amazon Nova depending on the task. The credit meter is transparent per prompt, and the $20 entry price matches Cursor and Windsurf Pro; the spec-first workflow suits structured work more than free-form prompting.

Pros

  • Replaces Amazon Q Developer's IDE role for free — Q closed to new signups on 2026-05-15, so Kiro is the AWS path
  • Credit costs are published per prompt: a full spec run runs 15 to 25 credits, so a Pro month buys roughly 40 to 60 feature builds
  • Spec-driven workflow (requirements, design, task breakdown) suits teams that review before they ship, plus Claude Sonnet 4.5 on the free tier

Cons

  • Credit meter is the least granular here: a complex run burns 15 to 25 credits, so the 50-credit free tier covers two or three real features
  • Add-on credits at $0.04 each mean overage is real on busy months, and there is no annual discount
  • AWS lock-in: Bedrock routing means Claude and Nova access, not the wider frontier-model menu Cursor and Windsurf offer

Pricing verified 2026-09-30

Frequently asked questions

Which is better overall, Windsurf (Cognition) or Kiro (AWS)?

Both are rated (4.0 vs 3.9); the right choice depends on your use case.

Do Windsurf (Cognition) and Kiro (AWS) offer free plans?

Windsurf (Cognition) and Kiro (AWS) have a free tier. Windsurf (Cognition) paid plans start at $20/mo (Pro); Kiro (AWS) paid plans start at $20/user/mo (Pro).

More AI Coding Assistants comparisons